Welcome!
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Still around...
Monday, December 3, 2007
ITEC 610 Learning - Team Assignments
There's always much to learn from doing team assignments during graduate courses. Below are some of the highlights from this week's Case Analysis project:
- Make sure that you start early, review often, and submit on time.
- Have an awareness of who is on your team, and when they drop the class!
- Designate several layers of review, so that more than one person sees the final product.
- When necessary, take the lead.
- When necessary, step back and let people do their work.
- Have large measures of patience on hand.
- Appreciate the contributions of others.
- Celebrate when it's done!
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Vista's Bad Press Never Ends
I know that I'm running it on my home machine, and have had very few problems after the initial (albeit large-scale) hiccups. *fingers crossed*
Monday, November 19, 2007
New RFID Standard - Is This the Answer?
Friday, November 16, 2007
Laptops Are Just Plain Naughty
Found an excellent article recently on why IT departments despise laptops. Is yours the same? Check out the article from Computerworld and let me know!
Thursday, November 15, 2007
ITEC610 Learning Highlight - Midterm
So we just had our midterm in ITEC 610, and it was a really interesting concept: we had to take our research papers and create an executive presentation. Pretty cool idea, and it was surprisingly difficult (see the summary slide above). Did I learn something? Absolutely:
- Brevity is difficult when discussing the contents of a 20+ page paper
- Brevity is critical when presenting information to executives and leaders
- One should never, ever overdo a presentation. At some point, animation is lame
- Cramming empirical data into easy-to-understand charts is, in a word, frustrating
- Globalization and the role that IT and communication played in its facilitation is a topic far better served by a lecture series, 100-page presentation, and several follow-up debates.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Your PC is terminal (pun totally intended)...
So it seems that despite the impressive progress being made in the PC market (who had dual or quad-core chips 3 years ago?), many believe that home computers will ultimately go the way of the cassette player. The reason? We're all so accustomed to using our cell phones, PDAs, and iPods that we forget about the lil' ol' computer sitting in our house, unloved and full of spyware. Read the full article for more information. And give your PC a hug, for goodness sake.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Humans are inherently bad at IT security?
There's an interesting article out there speculating that we (as in the human race) are ill-equipped to deal with IT security. It's a quick read, but an intriguing one: are we really that irrational and overreactive that we are fundamentally incapable of any real IT security development? I'm sure most of us would like to think otherwise, but read the article here and think about the implications. Maybe we'll see computer-generated security software in the future to compensate for our IT shortcomings?
Monday, October 22, 2007
Google will soon make your Cheerios
What won't those silly Google folks try? While the rumors have persisted for some time, and will likely continue to do so, the "legitimate" supporters are starting to surface more frequently. What are we talking about? A Google-developed free operating system. Google is already attacking Microsoft through its Google Documents freeware, and Microsoft is striking back by getting into the advertising business. Isn't it about time that Google use its resources to develop a free and light OS (instead of buying up all those server farms)? Oh, and some free WiFi while you're at it, Google? Please?
Continuous Quality Improvement - Always Good?
*Image courtesy of www.fyconsulting.com.Do you think there is a limit to seeking continuous improvement? That is, to what end should companies be willing to seek out new and improved systems and technologies? On the one hand, there will always be room for efficiencies, improvements, and process changes that will result in better performance and higher quality. One must admit, though, that such exercises are resource-intensive and can be costly. Moreover, the constant re-engineering in processes can sometimes have a negative impact on productivity, as employees must constantly adapt to new systems or business rules.
I'm more or less a firm believer in continual quality improvement, as it is one of the few guaranteed ways to stay abreast of the competitive landscape in a given industry and perhaps gain some competitive advantage. There might be a limit, however - especially for smaller businesses - where the marginal benefits of improvement don't offset the cost and productivity concerns.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Concession from a PC fanboy...

OK, so I've never been a huge Mac fan. But, the latest news about the Leopard OS is pretty cool. Apparently Apple is adding memory randomization and advanced program access controls in an attempt to improve the security of the OS. Read more at the ZDNet blogs, but suffice it to say that this is pretty cool tech.
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Are databases important?

The answer is, of course, totally. While website design is likely as important, one must have a strong and reliable database behind the scenes to keep things running and provide key information - especially when your website is your business. In our class this week, this was apparent when visiting Zillow, a real estate beta with some issues. The interface isn't terribly good, but it's the database deficiencies that worried us most. Things like data normalization, required fields, input guidelines, and primary keys are absolutely essential to a healthy, productive database.
So, the next time your DBA whines about the new corporate database, tell him to drink a Red Bull and get back to work. These things are important!
Saturday, October 6, 2007
My Security vs. Privacy Rant
The balance between security and personal privacy is an issue that has been raised innumerable times since the attacks of September 11, 2001. Some believe that even mentioning the 9/11 attacks in conjunction with security or privacy has become somewhat cliché, but the reality is that these issues have taken on a new light in years following the event. This issue may be seen as a spectrum, with absolute security on one end and complete, anonymous privacy on the other. Where we find ourselves along this spectrum, both individually and as a society, is the question at hand.
IOMA. (2007, July). Tightening security on technology devices without increasing worker resentment. IOMA Security Director’s Report, 7(7). Retrieved October 1, 2007 from Business Source Premier.
King, N.J. (2003). Electronic monitoring to promote national security impacts workplace privacy. Employee Responsibility and Rights Journal, 15(3). Retrieved October 1, 2007 from Business Source Premier.
Petersen, S. (2002,April 22). Can security, privacy coexist? eWeek, p. 72. Retrieved October 1, 2007 from Business Source Premier.
Zalud, B. Chipping away at privacy? Security. Retrieved October 1, 2007 from Business Source Premier.
Microsoft Easing Up on IE7 Customers?
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
ITEC 610 - Week 3
- The future of the Internet is going to be a wild, wonderful, and sometimes scary place. The dominant theme in my mind will be social networking and interactivity. Virtual worlds and collaborative environments will be huge, but the question remains: will these virtual lives be more interesting for many people than their real lives? How will this impact the functioning of our physical society? I'm wondering if, in the future, mothers' pleas with children to "get outside" will fall on deaf ears as their kids play online kickball with friends from halfway around the world...
- I looked at some interesting articles on RFID this week, and was amazed at some of its applications. It's being used to track files, inventory, shipments, and even people. Some are especially troubled by the "people-monitoring" potential for RFID, and a small population even equates it with evil. For the most part, though, it seems to be an important technology in reducing supply chain inefficiencies and costs - its eerie social applications notwithstanding.
- Should we be secure, private, or both? Many would argue that privacy is paramount, security would be nice, and a mix of the two almost always disappoints someone. My thoughts are that I'd be willing to give up some privacy in exchange for a known level of security, especially since I'm not doing anything illicit or illegal. However, the age-old question of "how much is too much?" is especially salient here. In the end, people must have respect for others' privacy, but this will be increasingly difficult as technology facilitates virtual invasion. For now, I haven't seen any good answers to this issue.
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Learning for Week 2 - ITEC610

Some additional thoughts:
- There seems to be a consensus that Linux, despite its current challenges and lack of support, may one day represent a legitimate challenge to the Windows domination. Here's to hoping that happens, as it will encourage better software development and technical progress.
- RAID is an extremely popular storage solution that sees increased usage with developing hardware support. As more and more data live exclusively in soft-copy, this built-in redundancy will be very important.
- Paper is still everywhere in offices around the world. Yes, we are reducing the amount produced every day. Yes, we are looking to digitize an increasing amount of content. No, paper isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
- Processor technology is moving at an incredible pace. With the number of cores increasing, and the size decreasing, the processor market is looking to heat up in the coming 12-24 months. Bring on Moore's Law!
Monday, September 24, 2007
Yup, this qualifies as "Kind of a Big Deal"
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Neat new Firefox extension
Letter to Microsoft
To Whom It May Concern:
I have been a user of Microsoft products for more than a decade. During this period I have been, at times, both delighted and disgusted with your software offerings. There were certainly instances of total elation – such as that offered by the stability and utility of Windows XP SP2. Lately, however, I have encountered a series of difficult disappointments that summarily led me to write this letter. In contemplating potential ways to improve the quality of your software offerings, I have developed four broad suggestions: make your software products cheap, of high quality, competitive, and transparent.
First, you must continue to find cost efficiencies in your production methods so as to bring cost savings to the consumer. Your core products, including Office and Windows, are prohibitively expensive for some users. An operating system that costs more than $400 (in the case of Windows Vista Ultimate) borders on the ridiculous; so too does paying more than $300 for an office suite. With the availability of viable open-source options becoming increasingly common, it may behoove you to exercise better control over your software production and development – and then pass said savings onto those who depend on your products.
Second, I think it is vital that you improve the quality of your offerings. When Windows Vista was launched earlier in 2007, it arrived with a host of problems. From miscellaneous bugs to broken features and a dearth of drivers,
Microsoft products used to dominate their respective software domains because they were superior to competitive products; the popularity of Word over WordPerfect is a good example. However, in recent times this has not been the case. As a third recommendation, I plead that you spend more development dollars to create competitive, first-class products. Internet Explorer, for instance, continues to see its market share dwindle because of superior open-source products such as Firefox or Opera. The Windows market is being threatened by various user-friendly versions of Linux, all of which run leaner than the resource-intensive Vista OS. Microsoft Office has suffered significant blows, most recently having its OOXML standard rejected by the ISO. Meanwhile, arguably equal or better products such as OpenOffice or Google Documents will erode market share. Microsoft, you must re-emphasize quality and competitiveness in your software designs, so that we consumers choose them because they are superior – not because they are the most widely available.
Finally, you must encourage transparency in your operations and software development. The most recent spat over Microsoft Windows Automatic Update, wherein the software would retrieve updates despite users’ settings to the contrary, brings this issue into sharp relief. Your market position allows you to do many things, one of which is the unfortunate ability to act in a monopolistic or autocratic manner. This behavior should be avoided, as it creates the sense that your software products are created without any genuine regard for the user. If an individual chooses not to invoke automatic updates, than he or she should have the right to instruct the software accordingly. This has happened in other cases, as evidenced by your recent loss in a European Union court over Windows Media Player. Apparently, your media software has gained an unfair market position due to its inclusion in Windows, and the difficulty users endure in disabling the software.
As a corporate entity, Microsoft, you are perhaps one of the great leaders. Your performance in the marketplace and ability to maintain a leadership position are certainly enviable. Your actual software offerings, however, have become somewhat lackluster while other corporate ambitions are satisfied (Xbox, the Zune player, etc). In considering the four measures suggested above - decreased cost, increased quality, enhanced competitiveness, and a focus on transparency – you may be able to regain the reputation and luster that your products once had. Your recent admission that OEM computer manufacturers may now voluntarily downgrade to XP signals that something is wrong with your current offerings. I implore you to consider these and other valuable suggestions, as they may help re-establish Microsoft as a credible, deserving industry leader rather than simply a leader in spite of itself.
Terry G
Diary Entry for 2017

Terry’s Diary Entry for Monday, 25 September 2007
Wow, today was a crazy day. Then again, when don’t I have a crazy day? It’s probably better to start by outlining everything that went on today:
I did monitor the Production staff’s machines to ensure that the organic hardware updates went smoothly, and it appears that they did. All of their hard drives re-configured their storage arrays to comply with the new PVFS (Post-Vista File System) standard. Gained an extra 2TB out of each drive by making the switch!
