Welcome!
Saturday, October 6, 2007
Microsoft Easing Up on IE7 Customers?
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
ITEC 610 - Week 3
- The future of the Internet is going to be a wild, wonderful, and sometimes scary place. The dominant theme in my mind will be social networking and interactivity. Virtual worlds and collaborative environments will be huge, but the question remains: will these virtual lives be more interesting for many people than their real lives? How will this impact the functioning of our physical society? I'm wondering if, in the future, mothers' pleas with children to "get outside" will fall on deaf ears as their kids play online kickball with friends from halfway around the world...
- I looked at some interesting articles on RFID this week, and was amazed at some of its applications. It's being used to track files, inventory, shipments, and even people. Some are especially troubled by the "people-monitoring" potential for RFID, and a small population even equates it with evil. For the most part, though, it seems to be an important technology in reducing supply chain inefficiencies and costs - its eerie social applications notwithstanding.
- Should we be secure, private, or both? Many would argue that privacy is paramount, security would be nice, and a mix of the two almost always disappoints someone. My thoughts are that I'd be willing to give up some privacy in exchange for a known level of security, especially since I'm not doing anything illicit or illegal. However, the age-old question of "how much is too much?" is especially salient here. In the end, people must have respect for others' privacy, but this will be increasingly difficult as technology facilitates virtual invasion. For now, I haven't seen any good answers to this issue.
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Learning for Week 2 - ITEC610

Some additional thoughts:
- There seems to be a consensus that Linux, despite its current challenges and lack of support, may one day represent a legitimate challenge to the Windows domination. Here's to hoping that happens, as it will encourage better software development and technical progress.
- RAID is an extremely popular storage solution that sees increased usage with developing hardware support. As more and more data live exclusively in soft-copy, this built-in redundancy will be very important.
- Paper is still everywhere in offices around the world. Yes, we are reducing the amount produced every day. Yes, we are looking to digitize an increasing amount of content. No, paper isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
- Processor technology is moving at an incredible pace. With the number of cores increasing, and the size decreasing, the processor market is looking to heat up in the coming 12-24 months. Bring on Moore's Law!
Monday, September 24, 2007
Yup, this qualifies as "Kind of a Big Deal"
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Neat new Firefox extension
Letter to Microsoft
To Whom It May Concern:
I have been a user of Microsoft products for more than a decade. During this period I have been, at times, both delighted and disgusted with your software offerings. There were certainly instances of total elation – such as that offered by the stability and utility of Windows XP SP2. Lately, however, I have encountered a series of difficult disappointments that summarily led me to write this letter. In contemplating potential ways to improve the quality of your software offerings, I have developed four broad suggestions: make your software products cheap, of high quality, competitive, and transparent.
First, you must continue to find cost efficiencies in your production methods so as to bring cost savings to the consumer. Your core products, including Office and Windows, are prohibitively expensive for some users. An operating system that costs more than $400 (in the case of Windows Vista Ultimate) borders on the ridiculous; so too does paying more than $300 for an office suite. With the availability of viable open-source options becoming increasingly common, it may behoove you to exercise better control over your software production and development – and then pass said savings onto those who depend on your products.
Second, I think it is vital that you improve the quality of your offerings. When Windows Vista was launched earlier in 2007, it arrived with a host of problems. From miscellaneous bugs to broken features and a dearth of drivers,
Microsoft products used to dominate their respective software domains because they were superior to competitive products; the popularity of Word over WordPerfect is a good example. However, in recent times this has not been the case. As a third recommendation, I plead that you spend more development dollars to create competitive, first-class products. Internet Explorer, for instance, continues to see its market share dwindle because of superior open-source products such as Firefox or Opera. The Windows market is being threatened by various user-friendly versions of Linux, all of which run leaner than the resource-intensive Vista OS. Microsoft Office has suffered significant blows, most recently having its OOXML standard rejected by the ISO. Meanwhile, arguably equal or better products such as OpenOffice or Google Documents will erode market share. Microsoft, you must re-emphasize quality and competitiveness in your software designs, so that we consumers choose them because they are superior – not because they are the most widely available.
Finally, you must encourage transparency in your operations and software development. The most recent spat over Microsoft Windows Automatic Update, wherein the software would retrieve updates despite users’ settings to the contrary, brings this issue into sharp relief. Your market position allows you to do many things, one of which is the unfortunate ability to act in a monopolistic or autocratic manner. This behavior should be avoided, as it creates the sense that your software products are created without any genuine regard for the user. If an individual chooses not to invoke automatic updates, than he or she should have the right to instruct the software accordingly. This has happened in other cases, as evidenced by your recent loss in a European Union court over Windows Media Player. Apparently, your media software has gained an unfair market position due to its inclusion in Windows, and the difficulty users endure in disabling the software.
As a corporate entity, Microsoft, you are perhaps one of the great leaders. Your performance in the marketplace and ability to maintain a leadership position are certainly enviable. Your actual software offerings, however, have become somewhat lackluster while other corporate ambitions are satisfied (Xbox, the Zune player, etc). In considering the four measures suggested above - decreased cost, increased quality, enhanced competitiveness, and a focus on transparency – you may be able to regain the reputation and luster that your products once had. Your recent admission that OEM computer manufacturers may now voluntarily downgrade to XP signals that something is wrong with your current offerings. I implore you to consider these and other valuable suggestions, as they may help re-establish Microsoft as a credible, deserving industry leader rather than simply a leader in spite of itself.
Terry G
Diary Entry for 2017

Terry’s Diary Entry for Monday, 25 September 2007
Wow, today was a crazy day. Then again, when don’t I have a crazy day? It’s probably better to start by outlining everything that went on today:
I did monitor the Production staff’s machines to ensure that the organic hardware updates went smoothly, and it appears that they did. All of their hard drives re-configured their storage arrays to comply with the new PVFS (Post-Vista File System) standard. Gained an extra 2TB out of each drive by making the switch!